|
Post by PotatoesRGoodYum on Jul 11, 2005 7:30:35 GMT -5
When Berard was drafted he was to become this super offensive dman.. he is mediocre at best... Brian Rafalski is better and Rafalski came in with no hype to live up to at all and yeah I am saying Berard is not among the top 50 defensemen in the NHL He wone the Calder trophy. Had 48 points as a rookie defenceman. He had the 2nd highest PPG ratio among defencmen in 03-04, behind only Gonchar (.82 to .81.) What is mediocre about that? What does hype have to do with it? Just because a player doesn't live up to the hype doesn't mean they're a bad player. If he hadn't missed 1.5 seasons with his eye injury, he would be the highest scoring defenceman from his draft. As it is, he's 2nd only to Redden by 20 points, and Redden has played over 100 more games than Berard. Ouch! someone getting schooled! Schooled? That wasn't even a response to my post! (although based on how your response here reads, it LOOKS like I'm getting "schooled"... on a subject I didn't even venture into!) How the hell did you manage to quote MY post.... when the "schooling" post you refer to came BEFORE my post in this thread. The worst part is... I thought you actually wrote a completely coherent, well thought out post..... until I realized all you did was fuck up when using the quote function. There REALLY should be some sort of proficiancy test given before people can post on these boards. Hahahaha looks like someone did really just get schooled expecting a coherent and well thought out post from relax/nirom is like expecting not to take a shit an hour after two bowls of bran flakes
|
|
|
Post by Fusion on Jul 11, 2005 7:33:33 GMT -5
I don't understand how people can screw up the Quote function ... it's not rocket science.
|
|
|
Post by SteveUL on Jul 11, 2005 8:00:45 GMT -5
I don't understand how people can screw up the Quote function ... it's not rocket science. Maybe if you had quoted the post(er) you were referring to ... we'd know specifically what you are talking about ... its not rocket science ...
|
|
|
Post by Fusion on Jul 11, 2005 10:39:52 GMT -5
I don't understand how people can screw up the Quote function ... it's not rocket science. Maybe if you had quoted the post(er) you were referring to ... we'd know specifically what you are talking about ... its not rocket science ... haha... you can't figure out what I'm talking about without quotes?
|
|
|
Post by Dirty Afanasenkov on Jul 11, 2005 10:57:48 GMT -5
This board has a quote function?
|
|
|
Post by SteveUL on Jul 11, 2005 12:58:32 GMT -5
Maybe if you had quoted the post(er) you were referring to ... we'd know specifically what you are talking about ... its not rocket science ... haha... you can't figure out what I'm talking about without quotes? No ... sorry I cant' ... not from page 7 anyways ... quoting the problem might have made your post a little more worthwhile ...
|
|
|
Post by Not2wonder on Jul 11, 2005 15:45:26 GMT -5
Holy Crap...........guess I misquoted someone some reaction................... Who the fuck is nirom?............woodsie?
|
|
|
Post by Not2wonder on Jul 11, 2005 15:52:15 GMT -5
Schooled? That wasn't even a response to my post! (although based on how your response here reads, it LOOKS like I'm getting "schooled"... on a subject I didn't even venture into!) How the hell did you manage to quote MY post.... when the "schooling" post you refer to came BEFORE my post in this thread. The worst part is... I thought you actually wrote a completely coherent, well thought out post..... until I realized all you did was fuck up when using the quote function. There REALLY should be some sort of proficiancy test given before people can post on these boards. Hahahaha looks like someone did really just get schooled expecting a coherent and well thought out post from relax/nirom is like expecting not to take a shit an hour after two bowls of bran flakes Now the quote works great............BTW small crappy post are better than Big Crappy post......less time wasted!
|
|