|
Post by jimmy on Mar 27, 2007 13:12:42 GMT -5
Well I don't predict the outcome of games but it's pretty obvious that we MUST win Game 5 tomorrow night. A loss tomorrow and I think that is the last game we'll be seeing at the Coliseum this season. With the exception of their lapse in the third period last night the Mooseheads are proving to be too strong for us to handle at the Metro Centre. When Moncton loses, you can come up and watch the Titan. I'll save you a seat Sorry, I've got plans tonight and tomorrow, so I guess I will have to catch up with you in the Fall ... ;D
|
|
|
Post by Penguins23 on Mar 27, 2007 13:21:27 GMT -5
Well I don't predict the outcome of games but it's pretty obvious that we MUST win Game 5 tomorrow night. A loss tomorrow and I think that is the last game we'll be seeing at the Coliseum this season. With the exception of their lapse in the third period last night the Mooseheads are proving to be too strong for us to handle at the Metro Centre. When Moncton loses, you can come up and watch the Titan. I'll save you a seat Be it golf or hockey I'm watching, worry pas I'll be up there again real soon.
|
|
|
Post by SteveUL on Mar 27, 2007 13:43:04 GMT -5
Well I don't predict the outcome of games but it's pretty obvious that we MUST win Game 5 tomorrow night. A loss tomorrow and I think that is the last game we'll be seeing at the Coliseum this season. With the exception of their lapse in the third period last night the Mooseheads are proving to be too strong for us to handle at the Metro Centre. When Moncton loses, you can come up and watch the Titan. I'll save you a seat Does that mean you are paying ?
|
|
|
Post by hipsterdoofus on Mar 27, 2007 14:54:44 GMT -5
When Moncton loses, you can come up and watch the Titan. I'll save you a seat Does that mean you are paying ? If I make more money than you, I'll pay Edit: Nevermind, I can't pay for everybody...I would like to but I can't.
|
|
|
Post by Not2wonder on Mar 27, 2007 15:32:12 GMT -5
When Moncton loses, you can come up and watch the Titan. I'll save you a seat I didn't know your golf course had stands for spectators. Actually they ve been drawing season ticket holders the last 3 years...........
|
|
|
Post by hipsterdoofus on Mar 27, 2007 15:44:45 GMT -5
I didn't know your golf course had stands for spectators. Actually they ve been drawing season ticket holders the last 3 years........... Last 3 years? I think you should re-check that info
|
|
bikerboy
Full Member
FrenchBoy
Posts: 341
|
Post by bikerboy on Mar 27, 2007 18:47:16 GMT -5
Riopel in net and a must win situation cats will win 4 to 2
|
|
|
Post by SteveUL on Mar 28, 2007 7:28:08 GMT -5
Riopel in net and a must win situation cats will win 4 to 2 We won't win this series relying on Riopel ... we need to go with Sniderman and expect better from the veteran.
|
|
|
Post by Cristobal Huet on Mar 28, 2007 7:54:14 GMT -5
Riopel in net and a must win situation cats will win 4 to 2 We won't win this series relying on Riopel ... we need to go with Sniderman and expect better from the veteran. He hasn't done it in 2007, .876 is why Riopel is starting.
|
|
|
Post by SteveUL on Mar 28, 2007 8:02:34 GMT -5
We won't win this series relying on Riopel ... we need to go with Sniderman and expect better from the veteran. He hasn't done it in 2007, .876 is why Riopel is starting. Sniderman's S% is higher than Riopel's ... check again. Neither guy has done it ... Riopel has been shaky in all his starts ... while Sniderman actually had one good game out of his two starts. If we are going to lose, I'd rather lose with the veteran in than with the rookie ... Riopel has played no better than Sniderman.
|
|
|
Post by Peter Loubardias on Mar 28, 2007 8:21:36 GMT -5
I agree. I think they should go with Sniderman the rest of the way. Riopel has been far too shaky in his starts and they need to go with the veteran, win or lose. Riopel will have his chance at it next year.
|
|
|
Post by Cristobal Huet on Mar 28, 2007 8:23:25 GMT -5
He hasn't done it in 2007, .876 is why Riopel is starting. Sniderman's S% is higher than Riopel's ... check again. Neither guy has done it ... Riopel has been shaky in all his starts ... while Sniderman actually had one good game out of his two starts. If we are going to lose, I'd rather lose with the veteran in than with the rookie ... Riopel has played no better than Sniderman. Which good game was that? He gave up a goal from near the goal line on Sunday(4th) and gave up 4 goals, he played better than Yetman, but that's not saying much. Riopel is the future of the team, I'd rather give him the playoff experience.
|
|
|
Post by SteveUL on Mar 28, 2007 8:43:20 GMT -5
Sniderman's S% is higher than Riopel's ... check again. Neither guy has done it ... Riopel has been shaky in all his starts ... while Sniderman actually had one good game out of his two starts. If we are going to lose, I'd rather lose with the veteran in than with the rookie ... Riopel has played no better than Sniderman. Which good game was that? He gave up a goal from near the goal line on Sunday(4th) and gave up 4 goals, he played better than Yetman, but that's not saying much. Riopel is the future of the team, I'd rather give him the playoff experience. If we are folding the tent and just playing out the series then that attitude is fine. But if we want to win then going with Riopel is the wrong approach. Both goalies are playing poorly ... I'd rather lose knowing that we tried to win rather than quit after Game 4 when the series was tied 2-2. If you have a rookie playing poorly and a veteran playing poorly ... I'd go with the veteran and hope he can turn it around. Too much blame on the goaltenders though ... the entire team has to tighten up and put forth a stronger effort.
|
|
|
Post by Cristobal Huet on Mar 28, 2007 8:51:46 GMT -5
Which good game was that? He gave up a goal from near the goal line on Sunday(4th) and gave up 4 goals, he played better than Yetman, but that's not saying much. Riopel is the future of the team, I'd rather give him the playoff experience. If we are folding the tent and just playing out the series then that attitude is fine. But if we want to win then going with Riopel is the wrong approach. Both goalies are playing poorly ... I'd rather lose knowing that we tried to win rather than quit after Game 4 when the series was tied 2-2. If you have a rookie playing poorly and a veteran playing poorly ... I'd go with the veteran and hope he can turn it around. Too much blame on the goaltenders though ... the entire team has to tighten up and put forth a stronger effort. Why would the veteran be more likely to turn it around? Riopel has outplayed him all year(except the Lewiston games). If anything Riopel has a better chance to turn it around, he was getting his first playoff starts and may have had a case of nerves...Sniderman has been playing at this level 3+ years, no reason for him to be bothered by pressure. The defensive zone play and PK has to be much better to give either guy a chance.
|
|
|
Post by hipsterdoofus on Mar 28, 2007 9:21:14 GMT -5
Sniderman's S% is higher than Riopel's ... check again. Neither guy has done it ... Riopel has been shaky in all his starts ... while Sniderman actually had one good game out of his two starts. If we are going to lose, I'd rather lose with the veteran in than with the rookie ... Riopel has played no better than Sniderman. Which good game was that? He gave up a goal from near the goal line on Sunday(4th) and gave up 4 goals, he played better than Yetman, but that's not saying much. Riopel is the future of the team, I'd rather give him the playoff experience. I don't see where you can say he played better than Yetman...they all sucked...not one played better than the other. I agree that Riopel should start...give him the experience. He's the future of the Wildcats
|
|